Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambling Audio Books
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 18:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ambling Audio Books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Defunct audiobook distributor that never met NCORP guidelines, not sigcov, limited userbase LegalSmeagolian (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Websites. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn’t find any sources that rose above "it existed". It meets neither NCORP or GNG. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't find any notable coverage, the cites listed are mostly WP:PRIMARY, fails WP:NCORP MetricMaster (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC) This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia. Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions. The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked.
- Delete - simply does does not meet WP:GNG or wP:CORPDEPTH.Onel5969 TT me 18:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.